Reports (102,799)

“There is nothing more practical in the end than the preservation of beauty, than the preservation of anything that appeals to the higher emotions in mankind.”

Stop sign is used for hate speech

High mount zip tie sign. no date

MTA/DPW postings are similar to guerrilla marketing campaigns used for promoting or publicizing commercial or non-commercial purposes. These postings should be promptly removed like graffiti to prevent adverse effects like pole damage, and blight and disorder from spreading. These postings violate laws and encourage others to do so, contributing to greater visual blight. Let's stop wasting public resources, instead use positive and effective methods to get word out.

Prove that Public Works, MTA, and other dysfunctional City departments are incompetent and overwhelmed. Suggest hiring private contractors to take over the task of cleaning up and maintaining a quality living environment for all San Franciscans. Private contractors will be more cost-effective and can be held accountable, unlike City employees. Have the Federal troops assume code enforcement.

Public officials, like DPW's Bureau of Street Misuse and Napping, joined to include the City Administrator, mayor, and supervisors, who routinely ignore the law like any common criminal, resulting in there is no law, no order, no justice, and the so-called 'civil authority' is worthless to the public's they are paid to serve.

ART. 5.6; SIGNS PROHIBITED: (a) Findings. The Board hereby finds and declares: The City has a compelling need to prohibit the posting of signs on public property in order to prevent the visual pollution caused by such signs and the resulting contributions to urban blight. Moreover, the placement of signs on public property causes damage to such property and, when signs are placed on or near traffic or directional signs or similar objects, threatens the safety of vehicular and pedestrian traffic.

ART. 5.6; SIGNS PROHIBITED: (a) Findings. The Board hereby finds and declares: The City has a compelling need to prohibit the posting of signs on public property in order to prevent the visual pollution caused by such signs and the resulting contributions to urban blight. Moreover, the placement of signs on public property causes damage to such property and, when signs are placed on or near traffic or directional signs or similar objects, threatens the safety of vehicular and pedestrian traffic.

ART. 5.6; SIGNS PROHIBITED: (a) Findings. The Board hereby finds and declares: The City has a compelling need to prohibit the posting of signs on public property in order to prevent the visual pollution caused by such signs and the resulting contributions to urban blight. Moreover, the placement of signs on public property causes damage to such property and, when signs are placed on or near traffic or directional signs or similar objects, threatens the safety of vehicular and pedestrian traffic.